About Me

Name: halthouse1
Email: exetertraining@aol.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
[Click to edit me]

What Will Save Our Economy?

The Political and Financial Markets Commentator (http://politicsandfinance.blogspot.com)

Monday, February 23, 2009

What Will Save Our Economy?

Mortgage Foreclosure Solutions House in chains

How Do We Get Ourselves Out Of This Crisis?

I have been accused by some readers of being a "Monday morning quartback", of critisizing and not offering solutions and of getting the facts wrong about why we are in the mess we are in. The fact of the matter is that the only one in that list that I am actually guilty of is not being able to offer a credible solution to a problem that is slowly sucking the country and the world down.

Now I am a pretty smart guy, but not smart enough to have the answer to a problem that the "best" minds on Wall Street created (of course with the help of the politicians of both party's), and that the "best" minds on Wall Street, Washington, academia and elsewhere can't seem to solve.

If only they had used their power for good instead of evil.

In any event, as I have mentioned before when it comes to macro-economic issues as well as the inner workings of markets, I find Jim Cramer to be an extremely knowledgable source. Not the greatest stock picker in the world, but that's alright.

These are his thoughts on how we can get out of this problem, which is much more definitive than the ever changing drivel that keeps coming out of Washington.

Jim Cramer

Love him or hate him, the man has actionable and definitive ideas based on an extremely extensive and successful background on Wall Street and as an observer of the markets and economy.

"According to Cramer, neither nationalization, which does too much, or euthanasia, which does too little, will work to save the financial system. He said what will fix it, however, would be offering 40-year, 4% fixed rate mortgages to everyone, especially to those whose mortgages are based on current appraisals. He again advocated forbearance for the banks, with no "mark-to-market" rules enforced.


Cramer said we simply cannot let the chips fall where they may, and the alternative of nationalizing will wipe out the preferred
stock and so much more."

This is a short synopsis of his idea, but to me it sounds as if it makes more sense than any of the start and stop plans that we have gotten out of Washington so far. I know the same critics will say that Obama has now ony been in office for _____ days, but Tim Geithner has been on the scene for a lot longer than that (the guy the administration just had to have despite his tax problems), as have the members of congress, and all of them still can't seem to be able to grab their own a___s with both hands.

Maybe they should bring in some new outside advisors. Sphere: Related Content
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Hypocrisy Of The Phrase: Failed Policies Of The Last 8 Years!!

From The Political and Financial Markets Commentator

Friday, February 20, 2009

The Hypocrisy Of The Phrase: Failed Policies Of The Last 8 Years!!

First, A Market Update

On December 8, 2008, I wrote the following:

"We will have the analysts and the "experts" explaining why, after this rally off of the lows set a month or so ago has already taken place, that we have seen the bottom. That we are forming a base, backing and filling, poised to now go much higher and all of the other cliches that you will hear on T.V. These are the same guys and gals who simply go with the momentum trade disguised by fancy talk. When oil was at $140 a barrel, there was no doubt that it was going to $200. Now that it is $40 a barrel, there is no doubt that the next step is $20."

In typical Wall Street analyst fashion, the "experts" were wrong and Thursday we took out those lows and now could have another leg down to who knows where. In another example of investors voting with there feet, excitement and more importantly confidence has not been created in the fiscal stimulus and mortgage plans announced by the Obama administration.

You Want It Fast Or Right?

I still know the drill all of you apologists out there. He has only been in office _____(fill in the blank) days.

The problem is that in this case there are no do overs or mulligans, and if he had not properly vetted his plan with Wall Street and others to make sure it would not only be received well but also be the plan with the highest probability of working, then he should have waited. It is arrogance of the worst kind to believe that you know better, particularly with some of the culpable players you have surrounded yourself with.

It rings like an echo in my mind, another Washington cliche that is always rolled out (except in this case where fast was the main goal): You want it fast or you want it right?

Mr. President, we want it right, because the economic stability of country's around the world depends on it. You hopefully did not over play your hand by setting the artificial drop dead deadline that you did.

A Revealing Walk Down Memory Lane

On a separate topic, you will not believe that I am having a real problem with some of the sanctimonious politicians i see on T.V. that speak of the failed policies of the last 8 years as if there was a finite break between the time that the Clinton administration ended and the Bush administration began.

Remember some of the players and situations from before Bush took office? Bill Clinton, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Melvin Watt, the expansion of the Community Reinvestment Act in 1995, the political clout of Fannie Mae, the political contributions made by Fannie Mae (now President Obama was a substantial beneficiary), sweetheart mortgage deals, the attempt to reign in the problem that was blocked by the Democrats when Bush was in office and so on and so on.

I know the rules of Washington. What you say in front of the cameras today is the new reality that wipes out any of your actions that have actually occurred through the years (i.e. Chappaquiddick, sorry couldn't help myself). Even though I know these rules, you reach a point where you just can't listen to it anymore without expressing some outrage.

The clip below was made during the presidential campaign, but is an excellent depiction of when the problem that we now find ourselves in originated.

It will also give some pretty credible evidence to the fact that some of these guys that stand up and say those famous words "the failed policies of the last 8 years" should look in the mirror and understand that while the American public might buy the arguments because no one is really pointing out the reality, they are not really fooling anybody.

Watch The Clip, And After That I Promise We Will Only Look Forward, At Least Until The Next Time.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The "Game" Of Politics Is Destroying Us

Monday, February 2, 2009

The "Game" Of Politics Is Destroying Us

This Is Serious: The Game Of Politics Is Slowly Destroying Us

http://www.memberguide.gpoaccess.gov/

I am a Republican leaning conservative and you might be the same or a Democrat or a Liberal or not really into politics at all. At the end of the day, at least when it come to our economic future, it is time to join forces and tell the politicians in Washington to cut the crap and put the country's best interests in front of their own political interest.

Party Line Voting

Now I am not in the negotiations for determining exactly needs to be done about the mess that we are in that has been in the making for more years than Bush was in office. This is not an easy problem with an easy solution as we can see by the fact that the TARP has been redefined at least three times.

We do supposedly have some of the best financial minds at our disposal to determine what we must do to fix this problem that has the potential to consume us all.

Unfortunately we then have the politicians who pretty much know very little about a large amount of things getting in the middle, getting their face time, pontificating, lecturing, porkulating (a new word meaning trying to get theirs for the peolpe back home) blaming and who are basically getting in the way of a solution being achieved that might work.

Explain to me how a party line vote works exactly. Not one person in a party disagrees with the subject and not one in the other party can agree? What are the odds of that?

It is time for our Senators and Congress men and women to cut the crap, get the gumption they said they had when we elected them, determine what they think is right or wrong and not what the party is telling them is right or wrong.

Do the best you can to fix the mess that is slowly sucking the life out of the economy and country. Stop worrying about re-election and do what you love to say you are in Washington to do: The People's Business. All the people, not just the ones in your state of legislative district.

Risk your political future for the future of the country!!!

Write your congressman or woman, write your senator, and tell them to cut the political crap and get back to yours and my business.

http://www.memberguide.gpoaccess.gov/
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »