About Me

Name: halthouse1
Email: exetertraining@aol.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
[Click to edit me]

Steve McNair Eulogized As A Hero: Is That Correct?

The Political and Financial Markets Commentator

SUNDAY, JULY 12, 2009

Steve McNair Eulogized As A Hero: Is That Correct?

Steve McNair Is Called A "Hero" and a "Legend" At Funeral

Bishop Joseph Walker III said during the funeral service the following:

"...Next time you write about Steve McNair, drop your stone. Next time you text somebody, drop your stone. The next time you Twitter, drop your stone."

This is a quote from the New Testament in which Jesus said that "Ye without sin, cast the first stone".

Is this possible or even advisable? Should some greater good come from this needless and senseless murder?

Steve McNair was an NFL quarterback, a good NFL quarterback. He did not deserve to die at the hands of a crazed and apparently depressed woman. 5,000 people including other NFL stars came out to pay their respects and speak of McNair the man, athlete and teammate. His mother said that the death was the work of the devil.

Was it the work of the devil, or the devil within? This fatal attraction murder was the result of a man having an extramarital affair. Those are the facts, but not really the facts that are being focused on. Should they be, or in death should we only dwell on the good, and not dwell on trying to bring some good from a tragic event?

Steve McNair & Sahel Kazemi

Athletes As Role Model

Nobody requires an athlete to take the responsibility of living life in such a way as to be a role model to children, adolescents and even adults as to the way that life should be lived. Athletes, maybe even more than "regular" people, grow up and live with a certain sense of entitlement as to how the "game" of life is to be played. With all of the temptation that surrounds them, particularly as a professional athlete, it would seem that perhaps they need to be even stronger than the average Joe. An athlete like a Tim Tebow seems to be much more exception than rule.

Right or wrong, the fact is that our kids grow up to idolize athletes. They are our heroes and we grow up dreaming that someday we may be a professional and get to live the life that on T.V. and in the press is portrayed as pretty damn good. In the days when I was growing up we really didn't know much about the things that went on off of the field. We just wanted to be Bart Starr and play for the Green Bay Packers. We, or at least I, didn't know about what they used to call the "drinking and carousing".

Today, in the age of TMZ, the private lives of our athletes are now very public. Every nick, scratch and indiscretion is laid out for all to see the minute it happens. Our children watch these things and interpret them in their own way. 

Some will see this event only for the fact that a man was needlessly murdered. Others may also see it as a tragic murder, but also take from it that Steve McNair was having an affair, the fact of which has been glossed over, almost making the act of marital indiscretion a non-event and perhaps even okay. Other may see it as the cause and effect that it was.

Bottom Line

In a world where the moral fabric in business, politics and personal behavior seems to be deteriorating at a rapid pace, a larger lesson needs to be taken from this tragic death. In death, mistakes in life are sometimes forgotten, and those who mourn focus only on the good. We as a society cannot allow this to happen. 

A better understanding of right and wrong needs to be resurrected and reinforced. This starts, if the discussion comes up, with an explanation of the sanctity of marriage. That when you take a vow, you keep that vow! Sphere: Related Content
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Major Sell-off In Bonds and North Korea Verbal Spanking (Not)

The Political and Financial Markets Commentator (http://politicsandfinance.blogspot.com)
 

Thursday, May 28, 2009

Major Sell-off In Bonds and North Korea Verbal Spanking (Not)

But First An Update On The North Korea Crisis From Hillary Clinton

As I had surmised, the Obama administration's answer to the crisis of a madman firing missiles and setting off nuclear tests is as expected: reliance on trying to get the madman to a negotiating table so that he can agree to terms he has no intention of abiding by and some more of those tough U.N. resolutions and sanctions. Read:

Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton visits United States Army Garrison (USAG) Yongsan, Seoul, South Korea - 20 Feb. 2009

(Fox)"North Korea will have to pay a price for its aggressive actions, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Wednesday, and she urged Pyongyang to return to the six-party talks that it abandoned in favor of nuclear weapons.

"North Korea has made a choice, chosen to violate the specific language of the U.N. Security Council (Resolution) 1718. It has ignored the international community, abrogated the six-party talks and continues to act in a provocative and belligerent manner," Clinton said during remarks with Egyptian Foreign Minister Aboul Gheit.

"In the United Nations, as we speak, discussions are going on as to the consequences that North Korea will face coming out of the latest behavior, trying to rein in the North Koreans and get them back into a framework they have chosen where they fulfill their obligations," she said..."

Pyongyang must be quaking with fear. As I have said many times before these are hopefully Obama's words for public consumption with covert action behind the scenes. This leader is a grave danger to the entire world, and mere table talk will unfortunately be an utter failure.

What Does A Steep Yield Curve Mean...If Anything In This Case

When I was a bond analyst for a sell side firm out of business school, a steep yield curve was a way to get retail investors into long bonds which in turn translated into more revenue for the firm. That is because the "spread", or the amount that a firm can make, is typically greater the further out on the maturity spectrum that you go. Back then for the purposes of Wall Street the steep yield curve proved to be a great marketing ploy.

Lend your money to your government Buy a United States government bond, second Liberty Loan of 1917, U.S. Treasury will pay you interest every six months. 1917

What Is This Steepness I Speak Of?

The steepness of a yield curve is the difference in yield between short-term bonds like the two year, and longer-term bonds like the 10 year. The yield of the 10 year treasury is currently 3.66%, and the yield of the treasury 2 year is .92% for a difference of 274 basis points which is close to record steepness.

Typically, a yield curve will steepen when the Fed lowers short term interest rates (it has no control over long rates other than open market operations)to stimulate the economy, and investors in fixed rate securities such as treasury bonds sell to move into the stock market, pushing yields up.

Is This Time Different?

In this case, could the rise in long term rates signify something other than economic expansion? Could it be inflation fears fueled by the amount of stimulus that has been injected into the economy? Could it be a normal adjustment in the level of rates due to that age old concept of supply and demand?

The federal government will be borrowing in the neighborhood of $2 trillion (with a t)in 2009, and the foreign governments that are providing this liquidity definitely have something to say about where rates will go from here.

China is the single largest foreign owner of treasuries, and without it's participation in new auctions, or worse yet if they decided to be sellers, yields will rise significantly.

What if the "green shoots" as the pundits on T.V. love to call them are really stink weeds, and the economy is not beginning to come out of recession? What will the trillions of dollars of stimulus money injected by the government chasing too few goods do to the level of interest rates due to spiking inflation?

We can only hope that President Obama and his band of merry men led by Tim Geithner and Ben Bernanke have some semblance of a clue as to what it is that they are doing. God help us if they do not! Sphere: Related Content
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Hypocrisy Of The Phrase: Failed Policies Of The Last 8 Years!!

From The Political and Financial Markets Commentator

Friday, February 20, 2009

The Hypocrisy Of The Phrase: Failed Policies Of The Last 8 Years!!

First, A Market Update

On December 8, 2008, I wrote the following:

"We will have the analysts and the "experts" explaining why, after this rally off of the lows set a month or so ago has already taken place, that we have seen the bottom. That we are forming a base, backing and filling, poised to now go much higher and all of the other cliches that you will hear on T.V. These are the same guys and gals who simply go with the momentum trade disguised by fancy talk. When oil was at $140 a barrel, there was no doubt that it was going to $200. Now that it is $40 a barrel, there is no doubt that the next step is $20."

In typical Wall Street analyst fashion, the "experts" were wrong and Thursday we took out those lows and now could have another leg down to who knows where. In another example of investors voting with there feet, excitement and more importantly confidence has not been created in the fiscal stimulus and mortgage plans announced by the Obama administration.

You Want It Fast Or Right?

I still know the drill all of you apologists out there. He has only been in office _____(fill in the blank) days.

The problem is that in this case there are no do overs or mulligans, and if he had not properly vetted his plan with Wall Street and others to make sure it would not only be received well but also be the plan with the highest probability of working, then he should have waited. It is arrogance of the worst kind to believe that you know better, particularly with some of the culpable players you have surrounded yourself with.

It rings like an echo in my mind, another Washington cliche that is always rolled out (except in this case where fast was the main goal): You want it fast or you want it right?

Mr. President, we want it right, because the economic stability of country's around the world depends on it. You hopefully did not over play your hand by setting the artificial drop dead deadline that you did.

A Revealing Walk Down Memory Lane

On a separate topic, you will not believe that I am having a real problem with some of the sanctimonious politicians i see on T.V. that speak of the failed policies of the last 8 years as if there was a finite break between the time that the Clinton administration ended and the Bush administration began.

Remember some of the players and situations from before Bush took office? Bill Clinton, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Melvin Watt, the expansion of the Community Reinvestment Act in 1995, the political clout of Fannie Mae, the political contributions made by Fannie Mae (now President Obama was a substantial beneficiary), sweetheart mortgage deals, the attempt to reign in the problem that was blocked by the Democrats when Bush was in office and so on and so on.

I know the rules of Washington. What you say in front of the cameras today is the new reality that wipes out any of your actions that have actually occurred through the years (i.e. Chappaquiddick, sorry couldn't help myself). Even though I know these rules, you reach a point where you just can't listen to it anymore without expressing some outrage.

The clip below was made during the presidential campaign, but is an excellent depiction of when the problem that we now find ourselves in originated.

It will also give some pretty credible evidence to the fact that some of these guys that stand up and say those famous words "the failed policies of the last 8 years" should look in the mirror and understand that while the American public might buy the arguments because no one is really pointing out the reality, they are not really fooling anybody.

Watch The Clip, And After That I Promise We Will Only Look Forward, At Least Until The Next Time.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

You Think The Economy's A Problem? How About These Guys?

From The Political and Financial Markets Commentator at http://politicsandfinance.blogspot.com

Thursday, February 5, 2009

You Think The Economy's A Problem? How About These Guys?


Economy, Economy, Economy - But That Ain't All

Oh yeah, do we have economic problems that are consuming us all on a daily basis. But let us not forget or foreign policy problems.

We have the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, which since the election we have not heard much about (could just be a coincidence or could it be that the media reporting on the negatives no longer has a reason to report).

But we also have two of the members of the Axis of Evil flexing some military muscle, perhaps as a test of the United States resolve under a new administration, and perhaps because they are an incredible danger to us all.

Iran and North Korea

Who can forget these guys? As reported by Reuters on Tuesday, North Korea is preparing to test its' longest range ballistic missile as the tensions with South Korea escalate. This development is a result of some actions by South Korea that are considered provocative by the North, prompting Kim Jong-il and the government to announce that the Korean peninsula is on the brink of war.

Meanwhile Iran and it's leader President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad launched a home grown satellite into space that has technology that is very similar to that used in a ballistic missile. Iran says that the technology is for peaceful purposes, and who wouldn't believe him?

While being focused on the economy as well as on staffing his administration and the distractions that comes with it (damn taxes), our new President had best not forget that these are potentially very serious foreign policy events that have to be addressed and not back burnered because they have not bubbled over yet.

Let's be proactive instead of the typical stance of reactive.

Sphere: Related Content
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Grabbing The Low Hanging Fruit

From The Political and Financial Markets Commentator at http://politicsandfinance.blogspot.com

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Grabbing The Low Hanging Fruit

Newsflash: In an attempt to allow President Obama save face and to avoid ugly confirmation hearings, Tom Daschle withdrew his name from the nomination process Tuesday due to the non payment of taxes. The state of his nomination and call for his withdrawl was discussed here on Monday.




The Outrage Stays The Same

What is that they say about the definition of insanity? What is that they say about the definition of insanity? Sorry about repeating myself, but I know i have asked this question at some point in the past.


Insanity is having the same information set with all of the same players involved working on the same problem in the same way and expecting an outcome that is somehow different from the time before. On a small scale this is what happens when we tell our kids to make their beds.


On a large scale, we have Washington and the economic crisis that we now face.

On the smaller scale, which is where we live, the debate about executive pay, executive bonuses and the naming rights of a stadium seem to usurp the debate over the bigger picture items such as TARP and the solvency of a nation.

As always the politicians will key on, and focus on, those topics that they think their constituency will focus on. The reality is that at the end of the day it is the big picture items mentioned above that had better be resolved fast.

As an update, my personal senators, congressman, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi have not given me any kind of response or feedback regarding my letter asking why they cannot put their own agenda behind ours for a change! Sphere: Related Content
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

An Open Letter To Nancy Pelosi

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

An Open Letter To Nancy Pelosi


 Nancy Pelosi
Originally uploaded by Lindsay Beyerstein

Good morning Leader Pelosi:

I am not one of your immediate constituents in California, but in your position as Leader of the House Of Representatives you do have a hand in the process that affects me as well as the people in the rest of the country.

I wanted to share an article regarding the need for TRUE, bi-partisan give and take when it comes at least in this case to getting this spiraling economic crisis to find a bottom and provide the potential for improvement.

I tried to send this to your office, but not being a constituent I wasn't allowed to, and the email address you provided for non-constituents bounced back so I am hoping that someone that reads this knows how to get it to you.

Please read the article in this blog from yesterday, and take these thoughts for how to handle this situation in the spirit that they are given:

End the verbal platitudes, end the blame game, end the endless politicking, put the country first and your career second, stop looking for what is in it for you and instead look for what is in it for all of us, understand that what you in Washington think is a big card game is peoples lives that are at stake.

What we have here is not a number on a Gallup poll or the potential loss of position on a committee for going against what the party leaders are saying. What we have here are the stores up and down the street closing, whole industry's being crippled, kids not being able to go to college, families losing their homes and kids going hungry.

You and your constituents who I will call the other members in Congress have your health insurance, good pensions, dining room, paid staff and paid office rent as well as other perks I don't even know about.

You can take as much time and play as many political games as you have to so that you look good for the people back home.

The rest of us do not have that luxury!!!

By the way, if you happen to see Chuck Shumer, Steve Israel or Harry Reid please ask them to get back to me on the letters I sent them.

Sphere: Related Content
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The "Game" Of Politics Is Destroying Us

Monday, February 2, 2009

The "Game" Of Politics Is Destroying Us

This Is Serious: The Game Of Politics Is Slowly Destroying Us

http://www.memberguide.gpoaccess.gov/

I am a Republican leaning conservative and you might be the same or a Democrat or a Liberal or not really into politics at all. At the end of the day, at least when it come to our economic future, it is time to join forces and tell the politicians in Washington to cut the crap and put the country's best interests in front of their own political interest.

Party Line Voting

Now I am not in the negotiations for determining exactly needs to be done about the mess that we are in that has been in the making for more years than Bush was in office. This is not an easy problem with an easy solution as we can see by the fact that the TARP has been redefined at least three times.

We do supposedly have some of the best financial minds at our disposal to determine what we must do to fix this problem that has the potential to consume us all.

Unfortunately we then have the politicians who pretty much know very little about a large amount of things getting in the middle, getting their face time, pontificating, lecturing, porkulating (a new word meaning trying to get theirs for the peolpe back home) blaming and who are basically getting in the way of a solution being achieved that might work.

Explain to me how a party line vote works exactly. Not one person in a party disagrees with the subject and not one in the other party can agree? What are the odds of that?

It is time for our Senators and Congress men and women to cut the crap, get the gumption they said they had when we elected them, determine what they think is right or wrong and not what the party is telling them is right or wrong.

Do the best you can to fix the mess that is slowly sucking the life out of the economy and country. Stop worrying about re-election and do what you love to say you are in Washington to do: The People's Business. All the people, not just the ones in your state of legislative district.

Risk your political future for the future of the country!!!

Write your congressman or woman, write your senator, and tell them to cut the political crap and get back to yours and my business.

http://www.memberguide.gpoaccess.gov/
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Unemployment: The Equal Opportunity Plague

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Unemployment: The Equal Opportunity Plague


 I'm confused...
Originally uploaded by apdonovan

Unemployment Runs Up and Down The Economic Spectrum

How appropriate to show an unemployment office in Manahattan, once the bastion of power for the brokerage and banking industry. With the loss of Bear Stearns and Lehman, countless forced mergers, reorganizations, layoffs and endless consolidations, New York City, along with cities around the country, faces a hit on multiple fronts.

First is the rising unemployment rate, with the current prospects for re-employment extremely difficult at a time when cost cutting and belt tightening are the steps taken before hanging a going out of business sign.

This creates a social problem up and down the economic spectrum as a feeling of hopelessness and helplessness becomes pervasive. A domino effect of bankruptcies and foreclosures then becomes a possible result. The currency of home equity is gone, and savings, if there are any become depleted.

On the city and state level, as is well documented in California, the loss of the tax base and revenue stream is dramatic. What defines essential services becomes fodder for debate as areas to cut expenses are searched for. An additional problem results from the fact that the municipal bond market has the same issues as the corporate credit markets. Difficulty raising money, and if it is possible, the cost will be high.

After what is being termed a black Monday for job cuts, more than 55,000 were announced (Washington Post) the hammer came down again on Tuesday.

As the pundits who like to use baseball analogies love to say, we are hopefully getting close to the 9th inning of this nightmare.
 
We better not go to extra innings!!!
 
The Political and Financial Markets Commentator
Sphere: Related Content
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Gitmo, The Taliban, Nukes and You

Monday, January 26, 2009

Gitmo, The Taliban, Nukes and You


 Taliban Personified?
Originally uploaded by pav21

The Plan To Shut Gitmo Down May Run Into A Headwind While The Taliban Has Not Gone Away, Far from It

In what can only be termed as an extremely disturbing situation in Pakistan, the Taliban is becoming a stronger and stronger influence, not only in the tribal areas but now deeper into the heart of the country. In a front page article in the Sunday New York Times, this penetration and the accompanying spread of terror and brutal punishment for the "violation" of its' own interpretation of how life should be is showing no signs of abating. To the contrary it would seem to be gaining momentum.

What this means for not only the United States but for all of the world is that this spread of the Talibans power, the fear of the politicians and security forces to stand up to it as well as the uncertainty of who in government is actually sympathetic to the Taliban, all places a nuclear arsenal in unknown hands.

This is an area that the Obama administration needs to address immediately. We know that these weapons would not only be coveted, but if obtained would no doubt be attempted to be used.

A Possible Monkey Wrench In The Plans To Close Gitmo

In a story in Newsweek, a Pentagon report that is due to be declassified will reportedly show that some of the detainees that have been released from Guantanamo have gone back to their terroristic ways. If in fact this is the case, can the Obama administration take the chance that a newly released captive perpetrates an attack on us or on our allies. I don't think they can.

For the Obama administration, getting the economy back on track is critical, but let's not forget the dangers from without that have never gone away!

Sphere: Related Content
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »