About Me

Name: halthouse1
Email: exetertraining@aol.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
[Click to edit me]

North Korea: Red-Headed Stepchild

<b>North Korea Wants A Little Attention Too</b> <div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"> <a href="http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2008/8/26/officialwinner128642717390990684.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="155" src="http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2008/8/26/officialwinner128642717390990684.jpg" width="200" /></a> </div> <b>Iran</b> is all about the nukes. Do they have them? What is their intention with them? Will they stop developing them? Will our "allies" support action against them? Diplomacy, sanctions or force? Will China go along with any of them? Will Israel be forced to take the nuclear installations out unilaterally? You get the idea. United Nations, IAEA and the Geneva Conference, it is all Iran all the time. <b>Afghanistan</b> is all about the troop surge. General McCrystal says that we need one in order to avoid mission failure. President Obama is only now arranging consensus among his non-military, more political advisiors knowing for some time this decision was coming. The liberal left wants none of a surge, while one prominent Democrat, Senator Dianne Feinstein from of all places California has just signed on <b>for</b> it. She recognizes the impact pulling out could have on Pakistan as well as the fact that President Obama chose McCrystal as his expert on the ground. <b>Will he, won't he and when will he?</b> Troops already in the theater need a decision one way or the other. Now we have <b>North Korea</b>. Remember them? One third of the Axis of Evil. Nuclear armed, run by an unstable dictator with one of its borders one of the most dangerous places on earth. Not that many months ago North Korea and Kim Jung-Il had the headlines. Test firing missiles and setting off an underground nuclear test. The world was focused on the Korean Peninsula just as it is now focused on Iran and Afghanistan. What is a deranged leader to do to make the world pay attention? <b>This rhetorical dance with North Korea is getting very tiresome.</b> On October 1st in a letter to the U.N. North Korea said that dismantling its nuclear arms was "unthinkable even in a dream." On October 5th, while meeting with the Chinese, North Korea said they were willing do resume nuclear dismanteling talks. October 10th there was noise out of Japan, South Korea and China about restarting the six nation talks. These problems, along with the Taliban violence in nuclear Pakistan, provide some huge challeges for the world community with few obvious solutions. Sane people negotiating with insane people is not going to provide any solution that has staying power. The diplomatic overtures are all well and good, but are only fluff to keep up the appearance of making goodfaith attempts to deal with these regimes. The actual outcome I fear will involve force, becuase diplomacy and sanctions are a joke to them. In the meantime, North Korea got itself back into the discussion.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

General McCrystal Muzzled

From The Political Commentator

If The President Can’t Speak To The General, No One Can!

“Ideally, it’s better for military advice to come up through the chain of command”, Jim Jones, National Security Advisor

Is The Chain Of Command Broken?

Now certainly President Obama could speak with him if he so desired, but that is obviously not the case. If General McCrystal, whose only axe to grind is winning the war and protecting his troops, wants to his formula for putting our best foot forward in Afghanistan heard, he has to present it himself. In public. Or see it ignored. Apparently, there are other military “experts” at the disposal of the President with even more experience and more desirable points of view then his own.

The chain of command appears to be good for a 25 minute talking to on a tarmac. Was this meeting about strategy, in which case 25 minutes seems a little light? Or was it a spanking for the general going public?

Who Are The Advisors That Have The Presidents Ear?

Well, Nancy Pelosi for one and Rahm Emanuel for another. Then you have a third, less obvious advisor that goes by the name Gallup as in Poll. This is a triumvirate of non-military experience who will try and guaranty different things to different constituencies. The President will get one thing, the military another and the American public and the world yet another.

For the President, the hemming and hawing, the indecision, stalling, pandering to the left, poll watching and desire to be the anti-Bush, will put him, at least for the time being, in a safer political position. It is decision by omission rather than by commission.  His stance does nothing for our troops or national security, but I suppose that is just politics.

Our military on the ground, as evidenced by the ambush and killing of eight soldiers in Nuristan, are up against an enemy that will do anything to advance the fortunes of the Taliban in Afghanistan. The well-documented rift between their commander on the ground and the commander in chief as well as the time it is taking to make a decision on a plan going forward, increases the danger and kills morale. The Taliban reads the papers and watches CNN. They are well aware of the Presidents lack of resolve and ties to the liberal left. They understand that ambushes and the killing of U.S. troops will serve to give the cover to the administration to pull troops out and go to surgical bombing that didn’t work in the past. The end result will be a total Taliban takeover of the country.

Finally, let’s take a look at the impact on the American public and the world community. We know the desires of A-Qaeda and the Taliban. Kill any and all non-believers wherever they are. Use any means at their disposal to accomplish this. Train those who for one reason or another can be indoctrinated into a philosophy by which suicide bombing of innocent men, women and children is not only acceptable, but a desirable way to go. They will turn Afghanistan in a training ground from which attacks will be launched all over the world. They will look to destabilize and already unstable nuclear Pakistan even further. A loss in Afghanistan will mean a much less safe world.
The Problems Are Many

The problems for achieving a good outcome in Afghanistan are many. What we do not need is for the war to be politicized and run from the standpoint of what it is the American public wants, and what decision will in the short-term lead to re-election. The stakes are far to high for that. The world for a long time to come may be defined by the outcome of this war if this war is allowed to turn into a defeat for us and a win for the terrorists.

Mr. President, take the reigns that you have been given and do what is right for the country, and not for the constituency that put you in office. Forget the left-right argument and do what is right for the country. Listen to your military advisors, and not your political ones!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"The Troop Surge" and "One Iranian Picture Is Worth A Thousand Words"

From The Political and Financial Markets Commentator

This Is A Photo Of One Of The Iranian Missile Tests, Fired Days After A Second Uranium Enrichment Plant Was Exposed. The Missile Fired On Monday Had The Capacity To Reach Israel And U.S. Interests 

The missile tests on Sunday and Monday put a clear face on our October 1st negotiations partner in Geneva. This should serve as a wake up call to President Obama as to the futility of negotiations with this type of regime.

The argument will be that Iran's purpose in conducting these tests is to gain leverage in the upcoming talks. My thinking is that it is further indication of the insanity of the Iranian leadership. 

Will The Real Robert Gates Please Stand Up

A force behind the Iraqi troop surge back in 2007, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has apparently found the appetite for politics at the expense of our soldiers on the ground in Afghanistan as well as the security of the United States. 

Remember on September 21st when General McCrystal, the chief of operations in Afghanistan who was placed there by President Obama, had this to say regarding the prospect of not increasing troop strength: 

"Failure to gain the initiative and reverse insurgent momentum in the near-term (next 12 months) -- while Afghan security capacity matures -- risks an outcome where defeating the insurgency is no longer possible." 

Now you would typically put a man in place whose opinions you trust as the gospel. If not, why have him there? President Obama and Robert Gates apparently seem to feel that Nancy Pelosi and the left of the Democrat Party have a better grasp on what is needed there, and it does not include troops. 

No, it encompasses a time table for withdrawal. The idea of the Democrat leadership is to abandon the mission, admit defeat, and let the Taliban run wild taking control of the country to turn it into one large training ground for terrorist trainees. All we need to do is examine the 3 foiled terrorist plots over the past week or so to realize that giving the Taliban free reign to train and deploy its own "troops" would be an unacceptable outcome for the United States! 

Now the situation on the ground is not a simple one by any means. Violence has reached an 8 year high, and the Afghan government needs to gain the confidence of its people as well as step up the capacity for it's own soldiers to eventually take over from the United States. This, so that at some time in the future we can pull back.

(Washington Examiner) "...Gates told ABC's "This Week," Obama will decide, within weeks, "whether or not to make adjustments in the strategy" in the wake of the country's recent election, as well as a dire new assessment of the war by Gen. Stanley McChrystal, commander of the U.S. forces in Afghanistan. "And that includes the question of, is McChrystal's approach, in the view of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Central Command commander, the right approach?" Gates told host George Stephanopoulos. "And if so, then what would be the additional resources required?..." 

The Conclusion 

Gentlemen, this is no time for focus groups, reading the polling data or consultation with the far left. This is the reason that you were elected. To make the critical decisions that are required for the security of the country. Not to politicize, but to strategize!

General McCrystal has made his assessment and no doubt has discussed it with the Joint Chiefs. Our men and woman on the ground face increased danger without the surge, and the mission will "result in failure" without the surge. It appears that their are two possible choices: 

1) Complete and immediate withdrawal with all of the unpleasant future outcomes this would enable; 

2) The troop surge as recommended by the Obama administration "expert" on the ground. 

As Malone said to Eliot Ness in "The Untouchables": "What are you prepared to do?" Well Mr. President, what are you prepared to do?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Consistency Of The Media Are It's Inconsistencies

The Consistency Of The Media Are It's Inconsistencies
 
During the course of the Bush administration the main stream media was all over the war in Iraq, documenting on a daily basis the violence and the tragic deaths of our soldiers, soldiers from other countries and civilians. These stories would be front page and would very often be the lead story on the nightly news
 
As the surge took effect and the violence precipitously dropped, the media somehow became silent and did not give it any of the coverage that it deserved. If reported it would be typically relegated to a page deep in a newspaper and deeper into a broadcast. That is to be expected as good Bush administration news would not be good news for the left in general, and definitely not during an election cycle. dog on newspaper The subject of the war and the bringing home of the troops or their redeployment was actively discussed during the presidential elections, but not really discussed much since the inauguration. As always the economic situation is the front page lead these days, but exactly where do we stand in Iraq and Afghanistan? Monday, bombings killed 34 people northeast of Baghdad, the third series of bombings this month. What are our plans going forward in this still very dangerous region? Iran Speaking of the Middle East, what is the status of the Obama plan to end our missile defense initiative in Eastern Europe in order to bring Russia into the mix of getting Iran to end it's nuclear ambitions? The Iran that we will sit down with us at a negotiation table and make all kinds of promises which we will ostensibly take at face value (by the way, where has Secretary Clinton been?).
For a look into what is currently going on in Iran, a Wall Street Journal editorial from Tuesday showcases Iranian treatment of political writers and thinkers, as well as providing comments made by the Iranian leadership as to it's thoughts concerning the U.S. and our new administration. All very instructive:

"Barack Obama extended the olive branch to Iran's leaders last Friday in a videotaped message praising a "great civilization" for "accomplishments" that "have earned the respect of the United States and the world." The death of Iranian blogger Omid-Reza Mirsayafi in Tehran's Evin prison two days earlier was, presumably, not among the accomplishments the president had in mind. Mr. Obama's solicitous message, timed to the Persian New Year's celebration of Nowruz, met a blunt response from the Islamic Republic's supreme leader, Ali Khamenei: "He insulted the Islamic Republic of Iran from the first day," he said. "If you are right that change has come, where is that change?"

To this, soi-disant Iran experts and latter-day Walter Durantys explain that it is merely Mr. Khamenei's opening gambit in what promises to be a glorious new chapter in Iranian-U.S. relations. Maybe the experts never got the message about no meaning no. And maybe Mr. Obama forgot that the late Ayatollah Khomeini tried to ban Nowruz, a pre-Islamic tradition, and that both Mr. Khamenei and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad have sought to curtail and Islamicize the holiday against widespread resistance. But never mind:
The most telling indicator of what we can expect from Mr. Obama's overture is Mirsayafi's death, a fitting emblem of everything the Islamic Revolution stands for on its 30th anniversary. What was a blogger doing in prison in the first place? Ask 26-year-old Kianoosh Sanjari, another Iranian blogger and Evin prison alumnus who fled the country in 2007and is now in the U.S. seeking asylum..."

 

Congressman Brad Sherman (D-California)
I happened to be watching the Larry Kudlow Show on CNBC and heard Congressman Sherman speaking on compensation reform and thought I had been beamed back to Russia in the mid-60's.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Inauguration Is Over, Time To Get To Work

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

The Inauguration Is History, Time To Get To Work

Market Update: As if to emphasize the urgency to get our economic problems fixed, the stock market took a sizable hit Tuesday, as Citigroup (C) traded under $3, Bank of Amercia (BAC) under $5.50 and State Street Bank (STT) was down close to 60%. The VIX, a measure of fear in the market was up over 10 points or 20%. It's definitely time for some kind of change!



 White House, Washington D.C.
Originally uploaded by hanneorla

The Festivities And The Honeymoon Are Over!

Moving, Historic, Joyous, etc.

These fawning descriptions of the inauguration of Obama from our "unbiased" news reporters are all well and good. The comparisons to where we were in terms of race relations and where we are now are great, but at this point irrelevant. Bottom line. He is now President and will be judged on one thing, and one thing only. Performance. Let's see him perform.

It is now Wednesday and the pomp and circumstance are a thing of the past. The inaugural address with all of its' flowery words and promises is in the record books. The inaugural balls and parties are done and the hangovers are being dealt with. It is now time, as they say in show business to "get this show on the road"

Let's Implement The Change And Fresh Ideas

Swept into power by promises of "change" (although his circle of advisers represents anything but. Mostly more of the same old tired Washington retreads) and "yes we can", he has precious little time to get done what needs to be done. Primarily that would be the righting of the U.S. economy and a continuation of whatever policies have kept us safe since September 11th.

The accolades and ring kissing are behind us. The starting gate has opened and the announcer has said "They're Off". Although he will be given every benefit of the doubt by the liberal leaning media, they will, as the media does, turn on him in a split second if and when he falters.

All of that said, what is it that the American public wants him to accomplish from all of the things that he promised that he would:

  • Ensure all children have health insurance 73%

  • Double production of alternative energy 70%

  • Reduce health care costs for families 70%

  • Enact major spending program on infrastructure 60%

  • Cut taxes for 95% of working families 57%

  • Withdraw most troops from Iraq within 16 months 51%

  • Increase military strength in Afghanistan 43%

  • Lift restrictions on government funded stem-cell research 42%

  • Close Guantanamo 32%

  • Make it easier for unions to organize 28%

(USA Today/Gallup poll)


It's a short honeymoon Mr. President. Let's get this show on the road.



Sphere: Related Content
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »